> ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://hubify.com/docs/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # Run the Publish-Ready Loop > Trigger the autonomous 5-round publish loop on a paper. What each round checks, how to read the preflight scorecard, and how to export the arXiv package. # Run the Publish-Ready Loop The publish-ready loop is a 5-round autonomous review cycle that drives a paper from draft to submission-ready. Each round runs checks across multiple AI models, generates revision tasks, and updates the readiness scorecard. You review after all 5 rounds and decide when to export. ## When to Run This * Paper readiness is ≥ 60% (Claims, Figures, and Bibliography columns all non-empty) * You have at least one completed experiment linked to the paper * All major results are in the claims table, do not start the loop with unverified claims ## Start the Loop 1. Go to **Papers** in the sidebar 2. Select your paper 3. Click **Publish-Ready Loop** in the paper toolbar 4. Set rounds to `5` (default) 5. Click **Start** The loop runs in the background. You will see round-by-round status in the paper activity feed. ```bash theme={null} hubify paper publish-loop paper-1 --rounds 5 ``` Follow progress: ```bash theme={null} hubify paper loop-status paper-1 --follow ``` ## What Each Round Does ### Round 1: Accuracy Pass Checks every claim against the evidence experiments. * Are stated numbers consistent with the actual data outputs? * Are error bars computed correctly? * Are units consistent throughout? * Any overclaiming relative to the data? Output: list of accuracy concerns, each tagged to the specific claim and section. ### Round 2: Completeness Pass Looks for gaps. * Missing citations for major claims * Analyses mentioned but not shown (figures or tables) * Standard methodology checks expected by the target journal (PRD, MNRAS, etc.) * Comparison with prior work, is the prior art properly characterized? Output: list of missing elements with suggested additions. ### Round 3: Clarity Pass Reviews readability and structure. * Abstract covers all major results? * Introduction motivates the work clearly? * Results section flows logically from setup to findings? * Figures are self-contained (captions tell the full story)? * Jargon defined on first use? Output: section-by-section clarity score + specific rewrites flagged for your review. ### Round 4: Adversarial Pass Tries to find ways to reject the paper. This round acts as a skeptical referee: What is the weakest claim? What alternative explanation has not been ruled out? What systematic error could invalidate the main result? What is missing from the null tests section? Output: list of referee-style concerns ordered by severity. High-severity items block submission. ### Round 5: Final Preflight Runs technical compilation checks and submission-readiness verification. * LaTeX compiles with 0 errors * All figures embedded (PDFLaTeX resolves every `\includegraphics`) * No undefined references (`\ref{}`, `\cite{}`) * Bibliography complete (no "?" entries) * Page count within journal limit * Author list and affiliations present * arXiv metadata (title, abstract, keywords) complete Output: the preflight scorecard. *** ## Reading the Preflight Scorecard ``` Paper: Observational Constraints on Bounce Cosmology Loop: 5/5 rounds complete Content: ██████████ 100% (7/7 sections) Figures: ██████████ 100% (11/11 placed) Bibliography: █████████░ 90% (57/63 resolved) Claims: ██████████ 100% (12/12 verified) Compilation: ██████████ 100% (0 errors) Review: ██████████ 100% (5/5 rounds) Accuracy: PASS (0 high-severity) Completeness: PASS (2 low-severity suggestions) Clarity: PASS Adversarial: PASS (1 medium, recommend adding null test) Preflight: PASS Overall Readiness: 97% ✓ READY FOR EXPORT ``` **READY FOR EXPORT** means all high-severity issues are resolved and technical preflight passed. Medium-severity items are listed as suggestions, not blockers. **NOT READY** means at least one of: Accuracy FAIL, Adversarial high-severity open, or Preflight FAIL. Resolve those items before exporting. *** ## Resolving Loop Issues After the loop, the paper issue list shows every item from all 5 rounds. Resolve them in order: accuracy first, then completeness, then adversarial. ```bash theme={null} # View all open issues hubify paper issues paper-1 # Apply a specific fix hubify paper revise paper-1 --apply issue-7 # Dismiss a low-severity item (with reason) hubify paper issues paper-1 dismiss issue-12 --reason "addressed in supplementary" # Re-run a specific round after fixes hubify paper publish-loop paper-1 --round 4 ``` *** ## Export the arXiv Package Once the scorecard shows READY FOR EXPORT: ```bash theme={null} hubify paper export paper-1 --format arxiv ``` This creates `paper-1-submission.tar.gz` containing: | File | Description | | --------------------- | ------------------------------------ | | `ms.tex` | Main LaTeX source | | `ms.pdf` | Compiled PDF | | `figures/` | All figure files (PNG/PDF) | | `references.bib` | Complete bibliography | | `supplementary.tex` | Supplementary material (if any) | | `arxiv-metadata.json` | Title, abstract, categories, authors | Upload the `.tar.gz` directly to [arxiv.org/submit](https://arxiv.org/submit). *** ## Best Practices * **Lock claims before starting.** The loop cannot verify unlinked claims. If a claim has no evidence experiment, it will fail Round 1 every time. * **Run the loop end-to-end before making edits.** Reading all 5 round outputs together gives you a prioritized edit list. Fixing between rounds means re-running earlier rounds. * **Do not dismiss high-severity adversarial findings.** They represent real referee risk. Fix them. * **Re-run Round 5 after any bibliography changes.** Citation resolution errors are the most common cause of a blocked export.